One day, we need to start counting things. The problem is the boxes are all the same. No marking, no nothing. There are Box A and Box B but there was no marking except to open each boxes and see before counting since both boxes looked exactly the same. What sort of design is that! It is like lucky draw. Stupid. If everything is like that, wouldn't it be the worst nightmare for people who do inventory? Is like we don't have enough on our plate? hm... anyway, I still don't get the idea of the inventory counting thing. Isn't it a bit pointless. Example, I counted the number of cigarettes. After handover shift, the person who took over don't count again but took from it. How did they know how much is originally there or if this person did not intentionally change or accidentally miscounted? What is the idea behind? or logic behind? Example person A write 5, the next person write 5 after selling 1. The next next person write 4 after selling another one. Meaning, 1 go missing? but in fact, it wasn't missing?
In actual there is 3. Or in actual sold 1, but there is 4 or 3.
If a person minus, forgot to scan. hmmm...... argh....
The amount I spent on learning before applying actually costed me more money until I do enough work. Still learning process is still needed even while working. Doing things subconsciously can make the easiest problem complicated. Could be your old habits or subconscious typing or the auto correction? hm.. This one is more like my habit. It is a hard to catch error when we did like that. I was thinking what goes wrong and no matter what I did, it would not return my desired results. Turned the code that I wrote previously and just a line only which I overlooked while checking, was blocking the rest of the changes… Dangerous code is the counter code that you wrote to right a wrong or blocking the wrong from working. That’s normally a temporary solution but the solution turned out to be preventing me doing other works… sigh… 😮💨 Today’s a lucky day and I found it while doing another part… so it is good not to always focus on one problem. The other problem could be the c...
Comments
Post a Comment