UWP, WinUI3, WPF

 I started with WinForms, then WPF, UWP and finally WinUI3. The way to use them doesn’t differ much. For that, switching between doesn’t take too much effort. However, as you move on to the newer framework, you will realised there is more and more bug. Each Framework more bug than the predecessors. Some like multi-touch that results in app crash. Even the template given or the examples given from books, crashed without mercy. So it means what? Why we cannot just improve the UI without affecting functionality? WPF was fine with both. Then UWP and WinUI suppose to replace it but why will u want to replace it with something that doesn’t do well and the lack of functionality. Shouldn’t it be an improvement and ease of use compared to WPF and WinForm. It is easy to use but either lacks function or the function goes along with a bug… Is it because AI developed it or because too little AI developing it? Not sure. After developing sometimes on WinUI 3, I realised the app has a feature that is easy to use library but also introducing bugs too. Most of the time spent actually wasn’t on App features but actually spent on figuring out these bugs… if can’t then have to find leeways to avoid using it. Doing that already defeated the purpose for improvement. Will Microsoft goes down based on these new frameworks? Or they earned more as more technical enquiries will start flooding in? Hm… Fed up. Maybe i should try out even lower level programming…